cites; once ｉn hｉs other bi...

Ｑ． cites; once ｉn hｉs other bi...

（今のの経済について）アダムスミスはどのように言うだろうか？
日本語訳お願いします。
（2/7）②-1、
②-2どちらの訳でもいいですが、
できれば②-②のやくをお願いします。
②-1 No, smith did not haｖe it wrong. It's just that some of hｉs self-proclaimed disciples haｖe giｖｅn us a tｅrribly incomplete picturｅ of Ｗhat he belieｖed. The man himself used thｅ phrase invisible hand onｌy three times: once ｉn thｅ ｆamous passage from Thｅ Ｗｅalth of Natｉons that eｖerybody cites; once ｉn hｉs other big book，Ｔhｅ Ｔhｅorｙ of Moral Sentiment; and once ｉn a posthumously published history of astronomy (in which he was talking about “thｅ invisible hand of Ｊupitｅr" － the god, not thｅ pｌanｅt). For smith, the invisible hand was but one of an array of intｅrestｉnｇ sociaｌ and ｅconomｉc ｆorces ｗorth thｉnking about.②-2Why did the invisible hand ｅmｅrｇｅ as thｅ one ｉｄｅa ｆrom Smｉth's work that everybody remembers?
Maｉnｌy because it's so simple and powerful. If thｅ invisible hand of thｅ marｋｅt really can be relied on at aｌｌ times and in all places to deliver thｅ most prosperous and just society possible, then we'd be idiots not to get out of thｅ ｗay and ｌet it work its magic. Plus, thｅ supplｙ-meets-demand straightforｗardness of thｅ ｉnｖisible-hand metaphor lends itself to mathematical trｅatment, and math is the ｌanguage ｉn whｉch ｅconomｉsts communicatｅ with one anothｅr.

日時：2010/06/12 14:47　Yahoo!知恵袋